BCA

Business Counsel Associates
Subscribe

How to Handle Conflict; Start with Clarity

February 06, 2010 By: azjogger Category: Management, Operations, Workforce

From Center for Creative Leadership, Leading Effectively Newsletter

Conflict — any conflict — can be traced back to one of five root causes. And, without knowing what the conflict is really about, resolution is impossible.

“Whether a conflict is personal, business, social or geopolitical, it stems from different views of facts, methods, goals, values or behaviors,” says CCL’s Harold Scharlatt.

Behaviors. Conflict, of course, can be caused when one person behaves in a way that another person finds unacceptable. Often, generalized and ongoing conflict sets in around behaviors – people often call this a “personality conflict.” For example, one of your direct reports has difficulty working with another. One is gregarious, quick to speak and very animated. The other is low-key, deliberate and reserved. They agree the conflict is just because they have such different personalities.

“It isn’t helpful to focus on personality in a conflict situation,” says Scharlatt. “Instead, hone in on specific behaviors: “He interrupts me in meetings.” “She takes too long to make a decision.” “He is so loud on the phone.” “She doesn’t share information I need.”

You won’t be able to change personalities, but people in conflict can agree to change behaviors or take specific actions.

Facts. The simplest cause of conflict is a difference over facts. Information can be gathered or clarified so that people can agree based on the facts. Of course, in many situations the facts people use for their arguments are debatable (which means the conflict is really about something else).

Methods. Conflict about methods is the next easiest to resolve. People may disagree on how to proceed, even if they agree on the facts and share the same goals. For instance, some in a department may prefer to keep using the current software system; others may argue that new software would be more efficient.

Goals. Without shared agreement about the purpose or outcome of the work among the people involved, conflict is inevitable. Bickering over behavior, facts or methods may mask a disagreement about the goal. Efforts can be made to communicate information, address concerns or persuade, but if the division remains too great, people will eventually leave the situation.

Values. Not surprisingly, differences over values are the most difficult to resolve. When conflict is over deeply held values, finding compromise or even acceptable next steps is a challenge. Agreeing to disagree is often an acceptable solution. If you do aim to shift values, understand that you are taking on a tough, if not impossible, task.

Once you have clarified the root cause or causes with the people involved, you can move ahead more productively. Scharlatt’s suggestions:

  • Clarify where you agree. Identify common ground or solutions that are easy for someone to take. This creates productive action and positive feeling before delving into the tougher disagreements.
  • Take a problem-solving approach. Be future-focused and avoid blaming. Ask “what if” and open-ended questions as a way to generate possible solutions.
  • Agree upon specific next steps. The conflict won’t disappear, but with a step-by-step approach, improvement can be made.

Conflict Is Complex

Conflicts often contain more than one root cause. Consider the array of conflicts around organizational change. On the surface, people might agree that “all the change” is the problem. Dig deeper and ask, what about the change is creating conflict? You may get a range of responses, such as:

  • Conflict over facts: “The data we use to make decisions is bad.” Or, “We’re not looking at the right information.”
  • Conflict over methods: “We needed to cut costs, but we’ve gone about it wrong.”
  • Conflict over goals: “I don’t agree that we need to diversify our approach. Let’s stick with what we do best.”
  • Conflict over values: “We can’t keep asking people to work these hours. They are getting burned out.”
  • Conflict over behavior: “I can’t get along with my new boss. He micromanages the department.”

Addressing the concerns of one group may be easy; others may require small steps to help manage and ease the conflict — even if full resolution is impossible.

Printed with permission of Center for Creative Leadership

The Negotiating Tactic of Yelling and Screaming

August 26, 2009 By: azjogger Category: Management, Marketing

By Dr. Chester Karrass

Some people get their way by deliberately yelling and screaming. It’s a negotiating tactic.

These screamers know from experience that other people find this negotiating tactic uncomfortable. Most people find it difficult to cope with a screamer. This is especially true if others are around to witness the scene. Most cringe at the thought of having to deal with an obnoxious character-so they simply give in.

A loudmouth is accustomed to winning these negotiations and uses this negotiating tactic time and again to get their own way, or to gain a better position than other, more reasonable people. Their plan is to intimidate the other party into submission.

People who yell and scream do so because they have learned, like children, that it is easier to scream than to take the time to persuade by rational means. In fact, the weaker their position, the more they resort to loudmouth tactics.

As parents, we have a responsibility not to let our children get their own way by yelling and screaming. When children rant and rave, we have to call their bluff by calmly demonstrating that their approach will not work. This takes a good deal of parental courage, patience, and self-confidence.

How do we handle the business negotiator who uses such tactics?

This question is important because many of us, sooner or later, will have to deal with someone who yells and screams. Don’t let this negotiating tactic trap you into responding with like actions. If you both end up yelling at each other a satisfactory outcome is a remote possibility.

The key defense is not to be intimidated. If you remain rational, refuse to take abuse, deal in terms of fact-not emotion, and act with quiet dignity and firmness, the loudmouth will soon stop. If not, then it is wise to bring them to someone at a higher level who can handle the screamer with calm authority.

The experienced loudmouth has won a lot of easy victories since childhood. Don’t let them win another one at your expense.

Dr. Chester L. Karrass brings extensive experience, advanced academic credentials in negotiation techniques, and over 35 years experience in seminar delivery. After earning an Engineering degree from the and a Masters in Business, Dr. Karrass became a negotiator for the Hughes organization

Article source: www.EzineArticles.com